Search results

Jose In!!

Mendy might be fit for this, which would be useful. I like Zinchenko, but not sure he’s defence minded enough quite. Would be nice to actually take something from Anfield for a change. Even if it’s just an intact bus.

Wow. That’s satire so cutting you could be on one of them panel shows on the BBC. Were you up all night thinking of it?

Liverpool saving themselves for their cup final.

Must. Take. Everything. Literally.....

I see there were some empty seats at UnsOld Trafford last night.... But it’s more fun to laugh at the footballing implosion Jose is masterminding.

Hmm. When a referee who has officiated four straight defeats for City in the CL makes a decision like that, it really does make you wonder why City fans haven’t really warmed to the competition.

Very pleased with a draw here.

Just checking, but West Ham fans do love PabZab don’t they? He deserves love!

Looked a lovely goal. Shame if it was a deflection. But either way... Arf. #pleasedontsackjose

I’d like to see Foden given a start after his performance on Tuesday.

Translation: ‘We’re not winning every week so it’s no fun now. I’m off’

Obviously good that Bojack is back. Big Mouth is set for a second series later this year. Disenchantment has been OK. Santa Clarita Diet is fun.

While it's traditionally used for geographical boundaries, as a term to describe the general act of denying a vote to certain sectors with a big stake, while allowing it to others, it fits well enough. If you have a better word to describe that, I'll use that. Anyway. Minister for Food eh?

Where are you looking? https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/vote-leave-guilty-fraud/

So the UK has created a ‘Minister for Food’ position in government on three occasions. 1914 1939 2018 This is all going REALLY fucking well, isn’t it.

Yes, and the referendum wasn’t gerrymandered or fraudulent at all, somthat razor thin majority is clearly a mandate to do whatever the fuck they like.

He looks like he’s in full on ‘third season get sacked and walk off with a massive pay off’ meltdown.

Some stonking goals in that.

It was mentioned in briefing papers and in parliamentary debates that the reason that there is no requirement to amend the franchise is because it is advisory. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2017/09/28/the-eu-referendum-was-gerrymandered/ So, 1. Yes. It legally was. 2. Yes. The reason that...