Boletus Edulis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2016
- Messages
- 2,679
- Reaction score
- 648
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Plymouth
- Supports
- Argyle (and West Ham)
You may have noticed that earlier this week that the Professional Football Compensation Committee ruled that Oxford have to pay us £200k compensation rising to up to £280 depending on number of appearances, plus a sell on clause for Curtis Nelson.
Curtis who was 22 and played for us over 200 times, being Captain for a large number of those decided not to accept a new contract, and as a free agent joined Oxford, which is his right. We declined the compensation offer from Oxford for him being under 23, and took it to a tribunal who ruled as above. This is compensation for our time in nurturing him since he joined us from Stoke as a sixteen year old. The Oxford Chairman, Darryl Eales, seems to think this rather unfair, and an excessive amount that he had not budgeted for.
To many Greens this seems a perfectly appropriate amount given the investment in this player that has helped make him what he now is. I wonder what others thought of Eales opinion, and whether you have similar positive or negative experiences?
Curtis who was 22 and played for us over 200 times, being Captain for a large number of those decided not to accept a new contract, and as a free agent joined Oxford, which is his right. We declined the compensation offer from Oxford for him being under 23, and took it to a tribunal who ruled as above. This is compensation for our time in nurturing him since he joined us from Stoke as a sixteen year old. The Oxford Chairman, Darryl Eales, seems to think this rather unfair, and an excessive amount that he had not budgeted for.
To many Greens this seems a perfectly appropriate amount given the investment in this player that has helped make him what he now is. I wonder what others thought of Eales opinion, and whether you have similar positive or negative experiences?