JimJams
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2015
- Messages
- 7,170
- Reaction score
- 2,567
- Points
- 113
- Supports
- Premier League Champions 15/16
The problem with going super cheap, in the 4-4.5M bracket is that if they don't play, they devalue by 0.1M very quickly which is essentially a 0.5M hit if you want to get rid of them. I might be wrong, but I don't see a single 4M defender nailed on to start the first day of the season.
Not quite true. Players increase and decrease in value based on the number of transfers in and out of that player. If you sign a 4m player that doesn't play and people get rid of them, then they lose value. Those drops are made at different triggers so you should keep an eye on the trans in/outs of players you're interested in buying/selling throughout a season. So what that means in theory is if you want to get 4m players which you don't intend to really use then it's actually best to go for the players you know nobody else wants. This will reduce the chance of them losing value as they won't be jettisoned in the amounts needed to trigger the drops.
Currently Baker at Villa is 4m and has been selected by 15.3% of sides. Tiendalli at Swansea on the other hand is only selected by 0.5% of sides. I'd assume the majority of people getting Baker in have bought him with the idea that he'll play after featuring a number of times last season, whereas Tiendalli only got 129 minutes for the season so people won't really expect him to play. If neither do then Baker will be sold on by a decent number of players and his price will drop. Tiendalli will likely stay the same as he's not being selected to play, merely to fill the squad.
The problem of course is if there is a 4m player that plays frequently and gets points, as all players will sell whoever they have at 4m in order to get the better player, and then no one is safe.