Luke Imp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2015
- Messages
- 12,961
- Reaction score
- 3,019
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lincoln
- Supports
- Lincoln City
The proposed new site is closer to the city centre than SB is I think.This has been done to death many times before but the main reasons behind moving are the transport and access facilities in and around SB. It's bad enough with 3-4000 people as it's hemmed in by housing and Sincil Drain. Access has been looked into many times but it's just not feasible no matter what has ever been trialled or suggested. Then there is the commercial prospects, a new build will enable facilities to be used 365 days a year and so garner much more revenue on and off the field. Our chairman keeps mentioning Chesterfields set up with the income streams they get solely from this aspect and that can then get ploughed back into the club wherever necessary. SB is just not used enough or commercially viable to make money on the larger scale with conferencing, retail and similar incomes. A new build out of the centre (but not that far out) will be able to get grants and tie ins with the colleges and universities so it's probably cheaper to do that than to knock down and start again with certain parts of SB. I know a lot of fans will be sad to leave if/when this happens, but if it meant a greater chance of success on the pitch, I would reluctantly say we need to do it to compete more where it matters, on the pitch.
But yeah, we've basically been told we can't re-develop the Echo Stand (which should have been the same size as the Co-op Stand, but we got relegated in '87 and had to chose between finishing it or staying full time).