League 1 General Chat Thread

Psycho Mouse

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2025
Messages
39
Reaction score
13
Points
8
Supports
Birmingham
No surprise that Birmingham have lost a lot. Wage bill 33 million but remember this is the season before they were relegated and includes championship tv money, There owners seem quite happy spending big this season,

The figures have been detailed today in the first accounts published under the ownership of Knighthead Capital Management, which confirm a £16.1m loss for 2023/24 - before that summer window. That is despite income rising 45 per cent to £28.7m because the wage bill went up 17 per cent to £33.7m.

Don't forget this was last season when the squad was fully of shit players on massive contracts.

This season the wage bill is a lot lower and the revenue is even higher. As a League One club, if it wasn't for Premier League TV money, we'd be on a par with a midtable Premier League side for revenue.

We will have the highest revenue by far in the Championship next season outside of clubs receiving PL parachute payments.
 

Psycho Mouse

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2025
Messages
39
Reaction score
13
Points
8
Supports
Birmingham
Whereas it's not exactly news, it's became pretty evident that unless you have a spectacular fluke of a season a bog standard club like a Mansfield, Lincoln, Exeter or Cambridge (no offence meant to any of those mentioned) league 1 is the highest you're going to get.

The only way to do it is increase your revenue. How you do that as a club like Mansfield is anyone's guess but you can't blame clubs like Blues and Wrexham for spending the money they make.
 

IzzyFook

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2018
Messages
173
Reaction score
20
Points
18
Location
Wrexham
Supports
Wrexham FC
Yes, but there are still a few stubborn posters here in the L1 forum who haven't moved over for some reason.
Pointless talking to yourself in an empty room, but I personally have had no issue getting on here on my phone on the rare occasion I do so - coz I usually have a mooch when on my laptop. Weird how some are affected but others not at all :dk:

I did have a spell a few weeks back where I couldn't get on here at all - lasted for a week to 10 days or so. Was just about to say fuck it, but tried one last time...and it let me on!
Btw, why not use both? I am for now....
 

Conker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
8,493
Reaction score
2,038
Points
113
Supports
Mansfield Town FC
Twitter
@CONKS__
The only way to do it is increase your revenue. How you do that as a club like Mansfield is anyone's guess but you can't blame clubs like Blues and Wrexham for spending the money they make.

Birmingham and Wrexham have been spending beyond the money they make, not got an issue with that but let’s not pretend otherwise.
 

denzel ecfc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
5,125
Reaction score
1,442
Points
113
Supports
Exeter City
What do you do if you run your club sustainably though? you've no chance.

When in league 1 you've Birmingham spending masses on transfers and wages, and Wrexham with all their circus to start all you're going to do is end up having a bigger and bigger gap.

Whereas it's not exactly news, it's became pretty evident that unless you have a spectacular fluke of a season a bog standard club like a Mansfield, Lincoln, Exeter or Cambridge (no offence meant to any of those mentioned) league 1 is the highest you're going to get.
In theory, we are running sustainably, ie we run a profit every year. However this is entirely due to player sales. One day I'm sure that will dry up so who knows what happens then. And finishing in the upper bottom half on league one is our ceiling, as the Birmingham fan seems to enjoy chiding us with.
 

BRFC_Gas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
1,235
Points
113
Location
Bristol, UK
Supports
Bristol Rovers
What do you do if you run your club sustainably though? you've no chance.

When in league 1 you've Birmingham spending masses on transfers and wages, and Wrexham with all their circus to start all you're going to do is end up having a bigger and bigger gap.

Whereas it's not exactly news, it's became pretty evident that unless you have a spectacular fluke of a season a bog standard club like a Mansfield, Lincoln, Exeter or Cambridge (no offence meant to any of those mentioned) league 1 is the highest you're going to get.
Some clubs like mine are better off competing at the top end of L2, crowds will come if doing well in any league. Mid table league one seems our absolute limit. This season we have spent more than we have ever done and look like going down.
 
Last edited:

White horse

Active Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2021
Messages
456
Reaction score
168
Points
43
Supports
Bolton
Don't forget this was last season when the squad was fully of shit players on massive contracts.

This season the wage bill is a lot lower and the revenue is even higher. As a League One club, if it wasn't for Premier League TV money, we'd be on a par with a midtable Premier League side for revenue.

We will have the highest revenue by far in the Championship next season outside of clubs receiving PL parachute payments.

Very debatable , how do you know what revenue you will have next season and be the biggest in the Championship. You do not know and why is your revenue going up this season without the Championship TV money, The other thing definitely going up is your debt, over 20 million on transfer fees in L1.
 

Throbber_for_Dunk

Active Member
Joined
May 27, 2023
Messages
444
Reaction score
157
Points
43
Supports
Cambridge
I've said this before, but if "spending beyond money they make" is the criteria, then it's easier to list the few EFL clubs that don't hit that.

Who didn't make some form of loss this (last) year? Exeter?
 

thewwfc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
2,367
Reaction score
680
Points
113
Supports
Wycombe
It’s a pointlessly escalating arms race though, I guess the winners in this are the players and their agents, who make more and more in wages and fees.

But the actual quality of the end product doesn’t necessarily go up.

There always seems to be new loopholes to circumvent any attempt to make things above board, as well.

I don’t know what the answer is, but I kind of sympathise with the Shrewsbury chairman when he was lamenting that the days of the local businessman made good being able to own a club are coming to an end - I mean, plenty of those are/were dodgy too (hi Andy Pilley), but I feel that it’s better to have someone with links to the local community, since in the ideal world (naive maybe?) a club should kind of be community property.

I don’t think our current Eastern European squillionaire owner has even been to a game…I know, I know, “can you blame him?” etc, but it does feel a bit weird just to be a line item on someone’s balance sheet.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
16,641
Messages
1,242,391
Members
8,534
Latest member
ownedbyrabbits

Latest posts

Top