ForzaCounty
Massive Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2015
- Messages
- 2,137
- Reaction score
- 1,008
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Stockport
- Supports
- Stockport Culture Club
First off, the idea of a three-game finals day is a non-starter. If County made the final, I couldn't care less who played in the other two games, not when I could be off having a pint and something to eat. Not to mention it takes hours to get to London, I'm not setting off earlier to watch someone else.
Extending the playoffs to six teams is silly; yes it makes the season a bit more exciting for some more teams but they're nearer mid-table than the top, they've done nothing to deserve a promotion chance.
I would like to see the playoff format weighted towards higher-placed teams, though. Giving 2nd and 5th place teams the exact same chance is daft, should never have been adopted in the first place.
Make it thus - Match A: 2nd vs 3rd, and Match B: 4th vs 5th. Winner of A goes to the final, loser plays the winner of B for another chance for the final. This way higher placed teams get home advantage in their games; 2nd/3rd teams get rewarded for finishing higher by being able to lose a game and still get promoted, whereas 4th/5th have to keep on winning.
Extending the playoffs to six teams is silly; yes it makes the season a bit more exciting for some more teams but they're nearer mid-table than the top, they've done nothing to deserve a promotion chance.
I would like to see the playoff format weighted towards higher-placed teams, though. Giving 2nd and 5th place teams the exact same chance is daft, should never have been adopted in the first place.
Make it thus - Match A: 2nd vs 3rd, and Match B: 4th vs 5th. Winner of A goes to the final, loser plays the winner of B for another chance for the final. This way higher placed teams get home advantage in their games; 2nd/3rd teams get rewarded for finishing higher by being able to lose a game and still get promoted, whereas 4th/5th have to keep on winning.
Last edited: