Championship chit chat/SERNWA has derailed a thread so I'll move into here thread

[MJA]

You said it.

So you spout shite off other no marks on a football forum like it's gospel? hahaha Brilliant.

Have I been called a 'no mark' by SERNWA? Christ, I've reached an all time low here [emoji38]

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[Haillay7]

I love the optimism of some people still trying to post sensible transfer related posts here and then instantly getting ignored as it continues down the same downward spiral!

 

[Reaper]

We were in for Brown but only as a squad player as a different option, particularly with Winnall out. Same as Vaulks. Neither would have got in our starting 11 but would have been good for depth.

Obviously Brown was going to pick the team that he would play regular first team football for. Makes sense.

Vaulks and Brown would defo be first team players at Barnsley, especially if White and Hammill can get in your team who weren't good enough here to get new contracts.

 

[JonBCFC]

Vaulks and Brown would defo be first team players at Barnsley, especially if White and Hammill can get in your team who weren't good enough here to get new contracts.

Just because a player doesn't do well at one club, doesn't mean he won't do well at another. There's been loads of players that hasn't done well at one club, but is class at another.. A recent example is lees at Wednesday.

Ridiculous comment.

 

[Reaper]

Just because a player doesn't do well at one club, doesn't mean he won't do well at another. There's been loads of players that hasn't done well at one club, but is class at another.. A recent example is lees at Wednesday.

Ridiculous comment.

Tom Lees was young lad at Leeds and now developed into a much better player now hes had a bit more experience, shit example really. Hammill been around a long time, wasn't that great at Wolves, then fairly average at Huddersfield before they loaned him and Danny Ward to us, Hammill was poor and Ward was half decent which is why we signed Ward permanently and not Hammill. Same with Aidy White, Leeds didnt want him and neither did we which says hes not championship standard.

 

[tarnluke]

Vaulks and Brown would defo be first team players at Barnsley, especially if White and Hammill can get in your team who weren't good enough here to get new contracts.

If you think Vaulks and Brown would start in our team then you really are deluded. Vaulks getting in front of Hourihane and Scowen? Not a chance.
Brown getting in front of Bradshaw, Winnall and Watkins? Not a chance.
I like both Brown and Vaulks and they'll be decent for you but they would not start in our 11 which is a fact.

You might be right about White. I'm still unconvinced, particularly at this level but he hasn't had a bad start.
You couldn't be more wrong about Hammill though, he had personal trouble and problems after his spell at Wolves and he's finally got over his troubles and came to restart his career with us. Barnsley FC and Adam Hammill just click together. JonBCFC makes a great point, just because 1 player doesn't do well at 1 team doesn't mean he won't at another.
He's by far better than the wingers you currently have anyway.

 

[Reaper]

If you think Vaulks and Brown would start in our team then you really are deluded. Vaulks getting in front of Hourihane and Scowen? Not a chance.
Brown getting in front of Bradshaw, Winnall and Watkins? Not a chance.
I like both Brown and Vaulks and they'll be decent for you but they would not start in our 11 which is a fact.

You might be right about White. I'm still unconvinced, particularly at this level but he hasn't had a bad start.
You couldn't be more wrong about Hammill though, he had personal trouble and problems after his spell at Wolves and he's finally got over his troubles and came to restart his career with us. Barnsley FC and Adam Hammill just click together. JonBCFC makes a great point, just because 1 player doesn't do well at 1 team doesn't mean he won't at another.
He's by far better than the wingers you currently have anyway.

Brown is a winger not a striker so he wouldn't take the place of any your strikers to start with, i dont think theres much between Brown and Kent in quality (both highly rated and will probably be future England internationals) so that one could go either way or both play at the same time. Having watched Hourihane and Scowen play numerous times on tv id put Vaulks along side Hourihane instead of Scowen but thats my opinion, i do rate Hourihane higher than Vaulks atm but i think Vaulks will turn out to be better in the future.

 

[markwwfc1992]

It's a shame he always seems to disappear when Rotherham lose a couple of games, but he always crawls back from under his rock when they win.

 

[Millerbri]

It's a shame he always seems to disappear when Rotherham lose a couple of games, but he always crawls back from under his rock when they win.

It's looking like it might be a while

 

[City169]

It's a shame he always seems to disappear when Rotherham lose a couple of games, but he always crawls back from under his rock when they win.

And how he'll also call fans of other clubs out when he thinks they do the same

 

[Hurrikeen]

We won't be the last team this season to concede 2 to Wolves and 3 to Villa. We had a kid and an unfit Kelvin Wilson against Morecambe.

Could be worse, we could have conceded against two newly promoted teams and relied on last minute winners against em.

What a gem that post was.

 

[StevieEvansRedNWhiteArmy]

We were in for Brown but only as a squad player as a different option, particularly with Winnall out. Same as Vaulks. Neither would have got in our starting 11 but would have been good for depth.

Obviously Brown was going to pick the team that he would play regular first team football for. Makes sense.

Tell your mate Craig . He's the one who claimed you were never in for em both.

 

[StevieEvansRedNWhiteArmy]

No edit, I can confirm.

SERNWA, for proof, I edited one of my posts and have screenshotted AberT's opening post, and compared with my edited one:

View attachment 4173

View attachment 4174

As you can see, there's no 'last edited' mark, and there is also no option to view the 'history' of the post.



That's just an horrendous backtrack. Get made to look a tit, claims to be winding folk up. It's like when kids get accused of bullying and they write it off as 'banter'.

Bullshit and there was no backtrack it's the truth and you all fall for it. Note that all the users who used to be on OFF know this and engage in normal conversations (bar that weirdo Mark).

 

[City169]

Bullshit and there was no backtrack it's the truth and you all fall for it. Note that all the users who used to be on OFF know this and engage in normal conversations (bar that weirdo Mark).

Everyone can see when the post is edited, the post you are claiming was edited didn't get edited.

SERNWA wrong but refuses to admit it- shocker

 

[StevieEvansRedNWhiteArmy]

0 in 4 games. I'm getting really worried for sure. Mind you the fact we've scored 8 goals in our first 4 league games alleviates some of that concern. How many have your lot scored so far?

You've also conceded 8 and must be the only team in the league to have conceded as many as us. That stat should be alarming to you. We've been playing title contenders and you've been playing the also rans.

Reality check is coming Sunday lad.

 

[Craig]

You've also conceded 8 and must be the only team in the league to have conceded as many as us. That stat should be alarming to you. We've been playing title contenders and you've been playing the also rans.

Reality check is coming Sunday lad.

Why's that? Because you're gonna beat us so bad that it won't fully sink in until the next day?

Those title contenders who battered you senseless couldn't put a goal past those also rans Derby who we beat 2-0 between them. The unbeaten yet to concede QPR were so rattled by our job on them that they went to Preston, clearly still shaken, and lost again. On top of this, and just in case you haven't noticed, top of the league Huddersfield scraped a last minute win against us.

When it comes to teams that I'm wary of playing then Rotherham are in the bottom three, just like they are in the actual league table....

I am King.

Of the mugs.

 

[StevieEvansRedNWhiteArmy]

Why's that? Because you're gonna beat us so bad that it won't fully sink in until the next day?

Those title contenders who battered you senseless couldn't put a goal past those also rans Derby who we beat 2-0 between them. The unbeaten yet to concede QPR were so rattled by our job on them that they went to Preston, clearly still shaken, and lost again. On top of this, and just in case you haven't noticed, top of the league Huddersfield scraped a last minute win against us.

When it comes to teams that I'm wary of playing then Rotherham are in the bottom three, just like they are in the actual league table....



Of the mugs.

Why's that? Because you're gonna beat us so bad that it won't fully sink in until the next day?

Those title contenders who battered you senseless couldn't put a goal past those also rans Derby who we beat 2-0 between them. The unbeaten yet to concede QPR were so rattled by our job on them that they went to Preston, clearly still shaken, and lost again. On top of this, and just in case you haven't noticed, top of the league Huddersfield scraped a last minute win against us.

When it comes to teams that I'm wary of playing then Rotherham are in the bottom three, just like they are in the actual league table....



Of the mugs.

You're living on a different planet to me if you believe Huddersfield, QPR and Derby will be challenging the likes of Villa and Brighton for promotion let alone a title.

It's quite cute how seriously you're taking league positions after 4 games, you've lost the same amount of games as us, there's two points in it, anybody would think you were 10/15 points in front after 30 games.

You're team is peppered with our rejects (Hammill, white and D'almedia). I think you're the team we're least concerned about.

Infact add Bradshaw to that list seen as we wouldn't match what you wanted to pay.

The only players we've got full hog toe to toe with you on have chose us (Brown and Vaulks) says it all really.

We even turned Kent down cos we didn't want to agree to that ridiculous rule where he has to play in 75% of your games.

 

[roversfan2001]

But it's fine for you to compare goals scored by players after 4 games...? You really are something else.

Sent from my HTC Desire 530 using Tapatalk

 

[StevieEvansRedNWhiteArmy]

But it's fine for you to compare goals scored by players after 4 games...? You really are something else.

Sent from my HTC Desire 530 using Tapatalk

Yeah course it is. He's been made out to be the next Messi and done fuck all.

We dodged a pricey bullet.

 

[roversfan2001]

Yeah course it is. He's been made out to be the next Messi and done fuck all.

We dodged a pricey bullet.

There's 42 games left of the season though.

Sent from my HTC Desire 530 using Tapatalk

 

[Craig]

You're living on a different planet to me if you believe Huddersfield, QPR and Derby will be challenging the likes of Villa and Brighton for promotion let alone a title.

And why not?

It's quite cute how seriously you're taking league positions after 4 games, you've lost the same amount of games as us, there's two points in it, anybody would think you were 10/15 points in front after 30 games.

A facetious response to your equally cute comments. Clearly. I'll be happy to come back to this and rub your nose in it after 30 games have actually been played though for sure.

You're team is peppered with our rejects (Hammill, white and D'almedia). I think you're the team we're least concerned about.

I don't need educating on Hammill, he played a dozen games for you, he's played over a hundred for us so I know what he's capable of. Aidy White similarly played what 10 games for you?. You have as much idea on the D'Almeida deal as I do, but I'm gonna go ahead and claim he chose us over you when he realised we were interested coz why the hell not?

Infact add Bradshaw to that list seen as we wouldn't match what you wanted to pay.

Allegedly. 4 games in so I don't think I'll start writing him off just yet.

The only players we've got full hog toe to toe with you on have chose us (Brown and Vaulks) says it all really.

We didn't want to match your bid for Vaulks. He would have been second string here as Hourihane and Scowen are streets ahead plus we have Moncur too. Brown will have been told in no uncertain terms he'd be back-up here too to the Rotherham rejects.

We even turned Kent down cos we didn't want to agree to that ridiculous rule where he has to play in 75% of your games.

Doubt it. I imagine you were as willing to agree to those terms as we were, and speaking as someone who's witnessed him play this season I can honestly say that clause aint gonna be an issue spadge.

 

[Another Walkley Owl]

You're living on a different planet to me if you believe Huddersfield, QPR and Derby will be challenging the likes of Villa and Brighton for promotion let alone a title.

It's quite cute how seriously you're taking league positions after 4 games, you've lost the same amount of games as us, there's two points in it, anybody would think you were 10/15 points in front after 30 games.

You're team is peppered with our rejects (Hammill, white and D'almedia). I think you're the team we're least concerned about.

Infact add Bradshaw to that list seen as we wouldn't match what you wanted to pay.

The only players we've got full hog toe to toe with you on have chose us (Brown and Vaulks) says it all really.

We even turned Kent down cos we didn't want to agree to that ridiculous rule where he has to play in 75% of your games.

Genuine question, do you really think players would pick you before Barnsley? Other than for the reason of money cant see that many would, what makes you think they would?

 

[StevieEvansRedNWhiteArmy]

And why not?



A facetious response to your equally cute comments. Clearly. I'll be happy to come back to this and rub your nose in it after 30 games have actually been played though for sure.



I don't need educating on Hammill, he played a dozen games for you, he's played over a hundred for us so I know what he's capable of. Aidy White similarly played what 10 games for you?. You have as much idea on the D'Almeida deal as I do, but I'm gonna go ahead and claim he chose us over you when he realised we were interested coz why the hell not?



Allegedly. 4 games in so I don't think I'll start writing him off just yet.



We didn't want to match your bid for Vaulks. He would have been second string here as Hourihane and Scowen are streets ahead plus we have Moncur too. Brown will have been told in no uncertain terms he'd be back-up here too to the Rotherham rejects.



Doubt it. I imagine you were as willing to agree to those terms as we were, and speaking as someone who's witnessed him play this season I can honestly say that clause aint gonna be an issue spadge.

Hammill isn't good enough for this league. Simple as that. Defenders don't fall for his 28373 step overs. Hardly raving about him this season.
Aidy White only played 10 games cos he couldn't get in our team and for 30 games last season we were fuckin atrocious, that tells its own story.
As for D'almedia, you do realise we released him after taking him on our pre season tour of Poland don't you? Therefore rejected him, like we did the other two, as we had a view to a permanent loan deal on Hammill and decided to fuck him off too.

There was no competition for either player when we got involved. Simple as that really. Izzy Brown and Will Vaulks are better than anything you've got in their respective positions and believe me you'll find out Saturday.

Sick of hearing of fucking Connor Hourihane, the kid isn't fit to lace Frecklington's boots let alone share a pitch with him.

There's nothing to doubt. That's a clause in his loan deal and we wouldn't agree to it. You see we won't be told who to play and how long for by other clubs. Brentford had a similar principle when it came to Tammy Abraham. Shows who's desperate and who isn't. I'm happy your happy with playing Ryan Kent for 40 games this season. You'll need to be. Again though we pulled out of a deal and ended up better off, Jon Taylor or Ryan Kent?? Tough decision. Compare their respective stats from last season of you like.

 

[StevieEvansRedNWhiteArmy]

Genuine question, do you really think players would pick you before Barnsley? Other than for the reason of money cant see that many would, what makes you think they would?

Why not? There's no differences between us and Barnsley bar the John Stones money. I believe we're far more ambitious than Barnsley too. It's our third season back in this division and our owner wants to progress to eventually become a Premiership club. He might sound incredibly deluded and mental but the ambition is there, there's an aim along with expanding the stadium. Barnsley have never shown a similar level of ambition or desire to succeed now or in their last championship stint.

 

[Bobbin']

What about when Barnsley actually were a Premier League side? Or when they played in a play-off final in 2000?

 

[markwwfc1992]

Why not? There's no differences between us and Barnsley bar the John Stones money. I believe we're far more ambitious than Barnsley too. It's our third season back in this division and our owner wants to progress to eventually become a Premiership club. He might sound incredibly deluded and mental but the ambition is there, there's an aim along with expanding the stadium. Barnsley have never shown a similar level of ambition or desire to succeed now or in their last championship stint.

Every owner in the country would want their team to be in the Premier League. Because your owner has stated that is his intention how does it make you more ambitious than Barnsley? Stupid comment

Barnsley are a much more attractive option than Rotherham, a much better history, much bigger stadium, more fans, more money. If they wanted any of the players you bought they could have had them in a heartbeat. Please quote me a source where any of your players have openly rejected a move to Barnsley for the bright lights of Rotherham?

I forget I'm talking to the village idiot who thinks losing 3-0 to Villa/Brighton is much better than beating Wigan/Burton 2-1. Did you learn to count to 6 yet SERNWA?

 

[Aaron-Bcfc]

Why not? There's no differences between us and Barnsley bar the John Stones money. I believe we're far more ambitious than Barnsley too. It's our third season back in this division and our owner wants to progress to eventually become a Premiership club. He might sound incredibly deluded and mental but the ambition is there, there's an aim along with expanding the stadium. Barnsley have never shown a similar level of ambition or desire to succeed now or in their last championship stint.

You were crying about Stewart's ambition "stretching as far as Wednesday's reserves" on here not long ago.

 

[JJH]

Hammill isn't good enough for this league. Simple as that. Defenders don't fall for his 28373 step overs. Hardly raving about him this season.
Aidy White only played 10 games cos he couldn't get in our team and for 30 games last season we were fuckin atrocious, that tells its own story.
As for D'almedia, you do realise we released him after taking him on our pre season tour of Poland don't you? Therefore rejected him, like we did the other two, as we had a view to a permanent loan deal on Hammill and decided to fuck him off too.

There was no competition for either player when we got involved. Simple as that really. Izzy Brown and Will Vaulks are better than anything you've got in their respective positions and believe me you'll find out Saturday.

Sick of hearing of fucking Connor Hourihane, the kid isn't fit to lace Frecklington's boots let alone share a pitch with him.

There's nothing to doubt. That's a clause in his loan deal and we wouldn't agree to it. You see we won't be told who to play and how long for by other clubs. Brentford had a similar principle when it came to Tammy Abraham. Shows who's desperate and who isn't. I'm happy your happy with playing Ryan Kent for 40 games this season. You'll need to be. Again though we pulled out of a deal and ended up better off, Jon Taylor or Ryan Kent?? Tough decision. Compare their respective stats from last season of you like.

How've you worked that one out then? You just loaned Izzy Brown from the same club; they're not going to have one rule for one youngster who joins little Bristol City, but dismiss their policies completely when European Giants Rotherham United show an interest in one of their players.

The desperation of having Abraham mind, who, I can categorically say, will score more than any individual in your squad over the course of this season providing he stays fit.

Edit: Also, Brentford's CEO claimed they were put off by the loan fee.

 

[StevieEvansRedNWhiteArmy]

What about when Barnsley actually were a Premier League side? Or when they played in a play-off final in 2000?

That's 16 years ago, No relevance now.

 

[StevieEvansRedNWhiteArmy]

Every owner in the country would want their team to be in the Premier League. Because your owner has stated that is his intention how does it make you more ambitious than Barnsley? Stupid comment

Barnsley are a much more attractive option than Rotherham, a much better history, much bigger stadium, more fans, more money. If they wanted any of the players you bought they could have had them in a heartbeat. Please quote me a source where any of your players have openly rejected a move to Barnsley for the bright lights of Rotherham?

I forget I'm talking to the village idiot who thinks losing 3-0 to Villa/Brighton is much better than beating Wigan/Burton 2-1. Did you learn to count to 6 yet SERNWA?

I never said ambition I said that was his aim, Big difference.

They don't have more fans in anybody's imaginations and wouldn't have more money if it wasn't for John Stones at the present time.

Izzy Brown has 100% rejected Barnsley for Rotherham. Common knowledge.