FIFA Arrests Made for Fraud

BigDaveCUFC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
3,680
Reaction score
699
Points
113
Supports
Curzon Ashton....and Carlisle
with that and possibly 1998 its no bloody wonder the French went against the correction choice in that election on Friday

good to see the French maybe getting a thumping though.....if that were true above they should be banned from the next event.....Mind I do not think the next world cup will take place
 

CEngelbrecht

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
267
Reaction score
44
Points
28
Location
Cairns, Australia fair
Supports
Kinetic skills
I love Beckham but coming out after the fact just reeks of band-waggon publicly. Where was he before these investigations started? Some of the high profile players should really have been standing up to FIFA but they're not added as long as they're in their money bubble.

More like wanted to make sure, Blatter couldn't saw the branch they are sitting on. Better late than never.
 

mnb089mnb

Ian
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
1,947
Points
113
Location
Bet365
Supports
Coral.co.uk & Ladbrokes.com
Twitter
@taylorswift13
with that and possibly 1998 its no bloody wonder the French went against the correction choice in that election on Friday

good to see the French maybe getting a thumping though.....if that were true above they should be banned from the next event.....Mind I do not think the next world cup will take place

The bribes related to the World Cup of 1998 were for delegates to vote for Morocco.

Would you ban England too for the handbags for delegates wives, friendlies in Trinidad & Thailand etc?
 

BigDaveCUFC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
3,680
Reaction score
699
Points
113
Supports
Curzon Ashton....and Carlisle
I have said before England are as much to blame. Very happy to give themselves until snubbed, then threw toys out of pram like spoilt brats all while claiming injustice.

I firmly think we will have no world cup in 2018 as not one country deserves it. I think 2018 will be scrapped by politics not footbal, then new vote for one after
 

mistermagic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
3,989
Reaction score
636
Points
113
Supports
Stoke City (I don't make the rules, Epic73 does)
Twitter
@FinallyFifou
with that and possibly 1998 its no bloody wonder the French went against the correction choice in that election on Friday

good to see the French maybe getting a thumping though.....if that were true above they should be banned from the next event.....Mind I do not think the next world cup will take place
We went against what now?
 

CEngelbrecht

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
267
Reaction score
44
Points
28
Location
Cairns, Australia fair
Supports
Kinetic skills
The bribes related to the World Cup of 1998 were for delegates to vote for Morocco.

Ah. Important detail, there. Must feel like a bunch of nitwits, like Donald Trump paying Karl Rove 50 million dollars to fix the US presidential election, so his puppet Romney wins, and then Obama gets bloody reelected anyway. How rotten a candidate must Morocco have been, when even money can't buy you democracy anymore? What's the world coming to?

I firmly think we will have no world cup in 2018 as not one country deserves it. I think 2018 will be scrapped by politics not footbal, then new vote for one after

Don't worry, World War III is on before then, so it won't even matter. The 1940 summer Olympics was supposed to be in Tokyo.

Chelyabinsk-meteor-008.jpg
 

Jarv

Active Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Messages
547
Reaction score
135
Points
43
Location
Rotherham
Supports
Manchester United
So how long before someone at the FA is implicated. Surely only a matter of time
 

CEngelbrecht

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
267
Reaction score
44
Points
28
Location
Cairns, Australia fair
Supports
Kinetic skills
FIFA confirmed that they did loan the FAI 5M€. Am I the only thinking that the FAI should be blamed as much as FIFA for this?

Don't forget, this is the Irish:


If only the world was like this. At least FAI don't try to hide it when asked. The Spanish or Argentinians or something would deny it for any and all time, untill the heavens fall.
 

Gulliball

Active Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Messages
359
Reaction score
185
Points
43
Supports
Torquay United
I don't blame Ireland for this. They had a legitimate sporting grievance, but no real legal case. Taking an "out of court settlement" was the simplest way to resolve the issue.

It's not the worst thing FIFA have ever done either - they compensated Ireland for unfairly missing out on a chunk of money and prestige when legally they had no case to answer. Ok, you can say it's an example of using money to solve problems, but at least it went to a Football Association, for a legitimate purpose, and as they were cheated out of a World Cup place, Ireland did at least benefit from the experience in the shape of their new stadium. It was officially documented too, even if it wasn't publicised. Given all the other things that have already come out, and will continue to come out, this will blow over pretty quickly.
 

nousername

Active Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Messages
225
Reaction score
102
Points
43
Location
Abu Dhabi, but from Glasgow
Supports
Rangers
It's a completely stupid thing for FIFA to do, and for the FAI to accept. Off the top of my head:

1. Why wasn't it publicized at the time? It makes a mockery of the Irish protests and their 'expletive' ridden tirades if they were quite happy to pocket the cash and STFU.
2. The FAI never had a legal case to begin with, so why was it paid? There was no 'issue to resolve'.
3. Did this influence FAI decision making and voting in regards to Blatter and FIFA?
4. The terms and conditions are incredibly soft and basically amount to it being a gift to FAI - is this FIFA policy?
5. It sets a dangerous precedent for effectively paying off teams if they think they've been wronged by a refereeing decision - that's ridiculous.
6. Where did the money come? Who decides these payments? Could that money have been better spent? Did it actually get spent on the stadium?

I don't want to take this thread on a tangent, but again it highlights the incompetency, opaque decision making and sleaze at FIFA.
 
Last edited:

nousername

Active Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Messages
225
Reaction score
102
Points
43
Location
Abu Dhabi, but from Glasgow
Supports
Rangers
If only the world was like this. At least FAI don't try to hide it when asked. The Spanish or Argentinians or something would deny it for any and all time, untill the heavens fall.

That's bordering on racism, corruption is not a Latino thing, trust me.

And anyway, the FAI kept quiet about it for years - why? 'Cause it looks, and is, dodgy as f**k.
 

Gulliball

Active Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Messages
359
Reaction score
185
Points
43
Supports
Torquay United
If you look at it as a pretty exceptional one-off situation, whereby a team unfairly lost out on a huge amount of money in a blaze of media, then it wasn't the worst course of action as it kept all parties relatively satisfied. In a well run and transparent organisation, I don't think it would have been a problem at all, similar maybe to the compensation Sheffied United received when they were relegated after West Ham played Tevez and Mascherano - it was too late or too drastic to reverse anything on the field, so they were financially compensated afterwards.

You're right though that there is a very slippery slope when it comes to secret payments and pay-offs. With an organisation like FIFA there's no trust that there's a positive answer to any of those questions.
 

nousername

Active Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Messages
225
Reaction score
102
Points
43
Location
Abu Dhabi, but from Glasgow
Supports
Rangers
It's not particularly exceptional though, is it? Referees make howlers all the time. Each team accepts it's a part of the game and they have to live with the outcome. (I'm not condoning the handball btw). I don't think the West Ham situation is comparable to a human error.

Why should all sides be satisfied? It's a two-legged knockout fixture. Not a fixture where the runner up secretly gets a soft loan that they can spend as they please.

The more I think about this, the more it bothers me. The FAI had no legitimate reason to accept the money, while it also undermines their ability to make unbiased decisions.
 

mistermagic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
3,989
Reaction score
636
Points
113
Supports
Stoke City (I don't make the rules, Epic73 does)
Twitter
@FinallyFifou
I understand what Gulliball is saying what with the financing of new stadia but I still can't believe that people are fingerpointing FIFA and FIFA only. When it comes down to it, the FAI did accept illegitimate money and nobody seems to care. Had they come out and said that they took a 5M€ pay-off to shut up, I don't think it would have gone down too well with the fans who made the trip down to Paris for example.
The FAI seem to get away with it on this one.
 

CEngelbrecht

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
267
Reaction score
44
Points
28
Location
Cairns, Australia fair
Supports
Kinetic skills
I think this thing with FAI illustrates the dangers of a global sport being run by an organization without standard transparency. Human nature just can't administer that much responsibility unchecked. Even if some may call this "handgate" a misdemeanor (God knows what this Warner fella is harbouring), such stop-gap measures sounds to me like a kindergarten. Yes, it's a game, but a tad more mature thinking, please.
 

rudebwoyben

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
4,526
Reaction score
1,554
Points
113
Location
London WC1E
Supports
Barnet
It's a completely stupid thing for FIFA to do, and for the FAI to accept. Off the top of my head:

1. Why wasn't it publicized at the time? It makes a mockery of the Irish protests and their 'expletive' ridden tirades if they were quite happy to pocket the cash and STFU.
2. The FAI never had a legal case to begin with, so why was it paid? There was no 'issue to resolve'.
3. Did this influence FAI decision making and voting in regards to Blatter and FIFA?
4. The terms and conditions are incredibly soft and basically amount to it being a gift to FAI - is this FIFA policy?
5. It sets a dangerous precedent for effectively paying off teams if they think they've been wronged by a refereeing decision - that's ridiculous.
6. Where did the money come? Who decides these payments? Could that money have been better spent? Did it actually get spent on the stadium?

I don't want to take this thread on a tangent, but again it highlights the incompetency, opaque decision making and sleaze at FIFA.
All good points.
Also, surely the head of FIFA shouldn't be able to act like an absolute emperor who can dispense favours and gifts on a whim.
 

rudebwoyben

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
4,526
Reaction score
1,554
Points
113
Location
London WC1E
Supports
Barnet
That must have been a real ghost goal seeing as we didn't play Germany at that World Cup Finals!
 

CEngelbrecht

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
267
Reaction score
44
Points
28
Location
Cairns, Australia fair
Supports
Kinetic skills

Forum statistics

Threads
16,573
Messages
1,227,134
Members
8,512
Latest member
you dont know

SITE SPONSORS

W88 W88 trang chu KUBET Thailand
Fun88 12Bet Get top UK casino bonuses for British players in casinos not on GamStop
The best ₤1 minimum deposit casinos UK not on GamStop Find the best new no deposit casino get bonus and play legendary slots Best UK online casinos list 2022
No-Verification.Casino Casinos that accept PayPal Top online casinos
sure.bet miglioriadm.net: siti scommesse non aams
Need help with your academic papers? Customwritings offers high-quality professionals to write essays that deserve an A!
Top