Bad that. They’ve played a manic schedule to get games done and done well the make it into the play offs.
Considering the ground isn’t the worst by any means in terms of facilities it seems madness.
It's the council playing silly buggers and ruining it for everyone, not the clubs. I feel for Gateshead. The NL making comically shit decisions as well. Altrincham being punished for finishing higher than Solihull, and Barnet would have been better off if they finished 3rd. Nothing they do makes sense.As fo gateshead, nah they knew what they had to do before the season, and i believe the conference/FL write to each potential club advising them of what’s required should the potential for promotion be realised.
Whereas it’s unfortunate for gateshead they’ll have been clearly advised long before and this won’t be a surprise.
It's the council playing silly buggers and ruining it for everyone, not the clubs. I feel for them. The NL making comically shit decisions as well. Altrincham being punished for finishing higher than Solihull, and Barnet would have been better off if they finished 3rd. Nothing they do makes sense.
The administration of the National League is an absolute joke. Everything always seems to be decided on a whim.They've now changed it, again, to give Alty the bye. Talk about just making it up as you go along. Honestly, part of me is going to miss the pantomime of that tinpot league.
You'd think so wouldn't you.Surely they just give it to whatever side misses out on the play-offs ?
I'd never wish success to that club but I'd gladly see them go up so we don't have to play them. Franchise supporters don't need to respond as I have most or all of them blocked. Fuck them.
You have our best wishes, I’m delighted you’ve got your promotion after that day and the class shown. Hopefully you make a better fist of it than we did.Sorry to have passed you pal, felt like we had a bit of a bond after the playoffs.
They've now changed it, again, to give Alty the bye. Talk about just making it up as you go along. Honestly, part of me is going to miss the pantomime of that tinpot league.
I do see this argument but for me it's as much about the sides that hover around the bottom of L2 for years as it is the quality of teams coming up. It might need more thought around supporting teams that go down, but then if it's not as hard to come back up then that might not be needed. On that front if you have more teams going down from L2, it follows that you'd expect there to be more "league-ready" clubs coming back up.This is why 3 up 3 down will die a death. I'm for it personally as it makes sense for the flow of the leagues but with Wrexham, Notts etc not banging the drum for it whilst they were both going tooth and nail, it will be forgotten about now. And with clusterfucks like this it will be put on the back burner and I can't see it happening soon at all. The EFL teams will just kick the can down the road and obstruct if it comes up again citing examples like Gateshead and all the plastic pitches that have to be dug up (Harrogate, Sutton, possibly Bromley in a few weeks). If Wrexham with their owners, money and publicity had somehow stayed down a year or two longer, it may have ended up happening.
Whats the difference between the NL clubs doing it and any other club in the FL doing to get to the riches of the next division? The obvious being Championship clubs risking everything to get to the prem. None of that is ever going to change unless there is a major reconstruct of football at all levels.We'll see what happens with the likes of Southend, Oldham and Rochdale if/when they sort themselves out but I think the other concern is clubs throwing money at getting promoted and risking the long term future of the club for the "riches" of the league. 3 up 3 down wouldn't change that but it could make it a bit less manic.
Whats the difference between the NL clubs doing it and any other club in the FL doing to get to the riches of the next division? The obvious being Championship clubs risking everything to get to the prem. None of that is ever going to change unless there is a major reconstruct of football at all levels.
You deserve your day in the sun. We had the better of that day but I'm not sure it's benefited us in the long term. We were woefully ill prepared for league 1. I'm sure your owners, who have stuck with Clough even after that day at Wembley, will make a better fist of it.Sorry to have passed you pal, felt like we had a bit of a bond after the playoffs.
I agree with a lot of what you say and as I say, if it was up to me I'd say 3 up 3 down because as an advocate for the English Football pyramid the weird L2-Nl bottle neck of one auto and two up is out of place.I do see this argument but for me it's as much about the sides that hover around the bottom of L2 for years as it is the quality of teams coming up. It might need more thought around supporting teams that go down, but then if it's not as hard to come back up then that might not be needed. On that front if you have more teams going down from L2, it follows that you'd expect there to be more "league-ready" clubs coming back up.
We'll see what happens with the likes of Southend, Oldham and Rochdale if/when they sort themselves out but I think the other concern is clubs throwing money at getting promoted and risking the long term future of the club for the "riches" of the league. 3 up 3 down wouldn't change that but it could make it a bit less manic.
Well, the difference is with only two promotion places it's more likely to fail, and with that you might see teams feeling as though they have to spend more to "guarantee" it, putting them in a bigger hole if they fail.Whats the difference between the NL clubs doing it and any other club in the FL doing to get to the riches of the next division? The obvious being Championship clubs risking everything to get to the prem. None of that is ever going to change unless there is a major reconstruct of football at all levels.
Yeah I can't argue with you there. You never know, they don't consult EFL clubs on lots of things these days...I agree with a lot of what you say and as I say, if it was up to me I'd say 3 up 3 down because as an advocate for the English Football pyramid the weird L2-Nl bottle neck of one auto and two up is out of place.
But I just can't see it happening. The publicity about it has already gone down tenfold since Wrexham went up and basically I just can't see there being enough traction and there's enough rope for the current EFL teams to say "nah" and cite what happened with Gateshead yesterday as one of a few examples.
I'd agree with most of this, all be it the 3-8th placed play off would be odd as essentially in 20 team leagues a mid table side could go up! Losing 8 games a season so 4 home games would hit income so would lean towards 22-22-22-22 system, 3 up, 3 down standard PO format.Three up, three down while incorporating the NL into a four-tier EFL of 20 teams each and a standardised promotion/relegation number between them. Adopt the NL play-off system because it keeps the season going for more teams and is more fun. Boot the under 21 teams out of the trophy and play the group stage Sat-Tues-Sat the week before the season starts when the weather is nice with relaxed sub rules so they're kind of like friendlies and people might actually want to go. Split the top tier of non-league into north and south with the champions promoted and then play-offs between them for a third. Thanks for listening to my Ted Talk.
W88 | W88 trang chu | KUBET Thailand |
Fun88 | 12Bet | Get top UK casino bonuses for British players in casinos not on GamStop |
---|---|---|
The best ₤1 minimum deposit casinos UK not on GamStop | Find the best new no deposit casino get bonus and play legendary slots | Best UK online casinos list 2022 |
No-Verification.Casino | Casinos that accept PayPal | Top online casinos |
sure.bet | miglioriadm.net: siti scommesse non aams | |
Need help with your academic papers? Customwritings offers high-quality professionals to write essays that deserve an A! |