LadyWomble
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2015
- Messages
- 130
- Reaction score
- 57
- Points
- 28
- Supports
- Wimbledon
The only thing that has any impact on whether B teams are introduced or not is whether EFL CLUB chairmen grow a spine or not. Losses from last year's poor attendances are being subsidised so whether we attend or not makes fuck all difference.
We saw with EPPP that when offered a short term cash injection then club chairmen will roll over.
I don't know whether similar incentives will be offered if it is eventually put to a vote for B teams to join the league. Make no mistake though - if enough subsidy is offered to offset a drop in attendances then chairmen are likely to accept.
I don't think it will happen, as any subsidy would be huge and likely beyond what the PL would be prepared to pay in comparison to the trivial Trophy, but let's not delude ourselves into thinking that the powers-that-be don't have the resources to offset any losses our teams will make if we don't attend games.
Added a word to your 1st para to make it explicit. Seems you're not getting much support as you don't think boycotts are worth it/you'll go anyway (sorry, didn't go back to check). But your basic premise is, sadly, correct - that many L1 and L2 chairmen will cave in. Yes, Shaun '3 Admins' Harvey is a useless though dangerous CEO but he can't force through any of his ludicrous schemes without the support of club chairmen. They make the decisions and most follow the money. In the case of EPPP, the Prem threatened to cut off all financial support (the wonderfully-titled 'solidarity payments') if they didn't agree so most clubs caved in. With the checkafraud thingy, the Prem have - so generously - chucked in an extra £1m (loose change to them) so the majority of chairmen, once again, caved in. Next step will be a re-run of the EPPP fiasco - we want our kids to play in the FL; if you don't agree, we'll withdraw our financial support. Think we can all guess how that will play out.
It's all so depressing :-(