Actually, there are important differences between the two front pages which clearly indicate a dig at City:
- Whereas Mourinho's face covers the whole front page exhibiting an expression of a man who is calm and in full control, Pep is shoved off to the side. He even looks like he's having a bit of a pray, as if he's going to need the assistance of the Almighty to have any success.
- The Mourinho story is right at the front of the paper on pages two and three. The Pep story is shoved all the way back in pages four and five.
- On the Pep front page they have stuck a picture of cold-blooded killer and all-round gobshite David Platt from Corrie, inviting the reader to subconsciously make connections between the moral character of the two.
- The date on the Mourinho front page is 27 May 2016, whereas on the Pep front page it is 2 February 2016, suggesting the latter is old news that no one gives a stuff about now.
So clearly a rag paper. Which is no surprise given I hear the MEN editor and Fred the Red are good mates and attend the same zumba class.
Fantastic close reading, now I can see what they meant!
Also, if you look very closely at both pictures you might notice that Pep is depicted as being bald whereas Jose is shown with a luscious head of hair. We all understand the implications of virility and power/authority being oh so cleverly hinted at here. A less biased publication may have opted to show Pep in a more positive light, like so...