cookiemonster
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2022
- Messages
- 190
- Reaction score
- 145
- Points
- 43
- Supports
- FGR
And the historic counties are still relevant in many sports e.g. county cricket, amateur golf.But was the Wirral ever part of Lancashire? I thought it was Cheshire and then Merseyside. So only right that no one there would care about Lancs.
The whole historic counties thing does have some cultural importance. Places that spent the best part of a thousand years identifying one way were arbitrarily lumped into a newly created metro borough. I can't comment on Merseyside too much as I'm not from there and never lived there. But despite some folk in places like St Helens having dodgy wool-scouse accents, that's not Liverpool. It's not even that close to the Mersey.
From a Greater Manchester point of view, it's quite annoying for a lot of people from bigger outlying towns like Bury, Rochdale, Stockport, Bolton etc to be called 'Manchester'. We're all distinct towns. I cringe when I hear people from somewhere like Wigan or Bolton say theyre from Manchester. They're just not. GManc was created out of bits of Lancs/Cheshire/West Yorkshire (and I think even some tiny Derbyshire too). So there's different dialects, cultures and histories. Someone from Hazel Grove says and does stuff quite a lot differently than someone from Horwich.
I think the further away from the urbanised M60 ring you'll find less of a connection to Manchester and more to the historic county. Especially so in more rural places like Littleborough (Lancs), Saddleworth (Yorks), Mellor (Derbyshire). They couldn't feel less like a part of a big city region like Manchester. These places have more in common with the neighbouring connurbations 'over the border' in Lancs/Yorks/Derbs. I know in the former two you'll regularly see the flag of the historic county flying and links to the past.
Anyway, as you can probably tell. Lancs not Manc for me!