dannyc5
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2015
- Messages
- 632
- Reaction score
- 137
- Points
- 43
- Supports
- Crewe
Once again, you, like most Oxford fans, don’t seem to quite be able to grasp what actually happened. Beckles got a private test because his wife asked him to. He had no symptoms. Nobody at the club knew he had a test. Because it was a private test and he had no symptoms, he had absolutely no obligation to self isolate, or indeed inform anybody of what he had done. So how could Crewe have asked Beckles to stay at home, when they didn’t know he had payed for his own test?It is amazing what happens if, as a club, you plan ahead which Crewe had the time to do as we managed it for our game at Accrington. We had 5 players who were feeling unwell or had a family member feeling unwell, so as a precaution they self isolated immediately. They were tested and if positive remain in isolation and if the result was negative then the club had made arrangements for them to travel up separately which happened for a number of them such as James Henry and Sam Long who then played*.
Now Crewe and Beckles could have done exactly the same, it is hardly that long a journey from Crewe to Oxford. He would have made it easily on Saturday, considering the time the negative result was received. At the worst it would have been 1 less sub if you hadn't taken somebody extra already. It was the obvious thing to do and would have kept your players safer, not incurred extra costs on yourselves, on us or the Hotel where you stayed and wherever else your squad stopped. Plus the game would have been played not causing a fixture backlog for both clubs.
Whoever made the decisions for Crewe after the positive test came back and coming to the ground/leaving the coach comes across as reckless in a week when local lockdowns and the measures have been increased significantly across the country. And the decisions by your club show utter disregard for the other Crewe players, their families and any vulnerable people they may have contact with.
As for Artell's interview, about all it was missing was chucking in "it is only a bit of Flu" with his disregard for Coronavirus considering he still wanted to play the game even after the positive test and the upward tick in the numbers across the UK.
*All players tested negative for Coronavirus but some weren't well enough to play still.
+assuming the reports are correct that he was the 2nd player tested positive
As for Crewe turning up at the ground, it would have been better to call ahead. However, how would the EFL have looked at that? We know how flaky they are, and we know they have threatened teams with expulsion from the Carabao Cup. With no guidance in place for a situation like this, how do you know exactly what to do? And besides, if Oxford correctly implement Covid protocols at their ground, then the Crewe players and staff won’t have been anywhere near your staff.
Storm in a teacup. Oxford fans are just angry they had their Saturday ruined and are lashing out. Completely melodramatic. Pretty pathetic really.