- Joined
- Jan 17, 2015
- Messages
- 4,125
- Reaction score
- 1,825
- Points
- 113
- Supports
- Dagenham and Redbridge
^
Erm… I recognise it could be. Shane has undoubtedly added some star power and intrigue to the card, which is what it needed. The angle has got people talking and it's possible he was brought in simply and solely to have that effect. Perhaps there is no medium-to-long term plan.
But that's really shit. I'm not saying such booking is beneath them as it demonstrably isn't (we're talking about the same people responsible for the anonymous GM angle here) but I dunno… I guess I'm just struggling to accept they'd waste Shane's return on something so short-term. They didn't have to tease a takeover. They didn't have to use Shane in this way, especially not if the plan is to have him fuck off again.
Also, I don't think Shane not being advertised for post-WM shows tells us much, as that may be deliberate. It took them a while but I think WWE is now quite savvy to how little details like that show their hand and effectively function as spoilers. We'll see I guess.
You seem very sure Taker isn't loosing. Why?
More to do with the fact I don't suspect Shane is sticking around after Wrestlemania. But I also can't quite envisage Taker losing to Shane at WM unless it is a screwjob. I hope you're right and there is an intriguing angle but I don't have faith in WWE to pull it off.