MagpieBee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2015
- Messages
- 3,130
- Reaction score
- 640
- Points
- 113
- Supports
- Brentford, Newcastle, Chicago Bears
TBF, I didn’t say it would be specifically Clucas, just that you needed to sell someone to raise the funds.I admit my initial post was lazy. I meant to allude to the bid reported by Sky and then theorise it must be independent of Clucas but I jumbled it up. Sky saying "may" definitely isn't "it's all dependent on selling Clucas" though
fwiw I don't see anyone coming in for Clucas on account of him being meh. I was surprised Burnley wanted him. If it was a possibility I'd straight swap him for Woods tbh.
And sausages are nice even if it ain't great to look like one.
Think Woods will do well for you guys. Great footballer, held back by being distinctly average in a few areas (his goal record is terrible, and he gets surprisingly few assists), otherwise I genuinely believe he would have hit the Premier League sooner. We’ll miss him for sure, won’t be easy to replace, but the cash is more important to us.