That Fat Centre Half
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2015
- Messages
- 4,381
- Reaction score
- 1,127
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Bournemouth
- Supports
- Luton Town
Agree on being on the Jones side of this, feels like it’s a longer term better investment to invest in your own players than someone else’s. KDH was I think a bit of a special case where he knew that team probably needed one top class player to keep it in the league, and he took an opportunity in the covid era to get one. Having 3 potentially key players as loanees feels excessive imo.Depends how. To be honest, I’m more in the Jones camp here. All you’re doing is developing a player for someone else who can be recalled in January if doing well. There’s only limited upside.
I’ve said before that each team who develops a loan player for someone else should receive 1% of the next sale transfer fee for every 30 days at the club, in the same way as a sell on clause. Would also stop teams stockpiling talent and it filtering down somewhat, increase the longevity of careers and actually improve the quality of the lower leagues.
Sake of argument - Luton and Blackpool both held Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall for 300 days each. If he leaves for £40M this week, both clubs would receive £4M each because they were vital to his development.
I like the idea, although as with all these things I’d worry about what unforeseen incentives it produces, could see it having an inverse effect of clubs not wanting to loan players out at all.