w/e Saturday 30th November

[mozzavale]

I just watched the extended highlights. I thought Harper's 1st yellow card was actually slightly harsh. The 2nd was obviously stonewall. I laughed at the co commentator, who said he got a slight touch on the ball. Ridiculous comment.

Some of Vale's defending was absolutely outstanding. We only created 2 golden chances despite the man advantage, which is a credit to them.

I also didn't realise we hit the outside of the post with Holicek's hugely deflected shot (which was somehow given as a goal kick).

Talking of deflections, the Vale goal was deflected. For some reason it's a lot clearer on the extended highlights. The clip put on this thread was a bit unclear. It was a great connection, but the deflection completely took it away from the keeper.

I also think Vale should have done better with the chance Richards put wide after they pressed and dispossessed Sanders. That was probably their best opening of the game. If that had gone in, it's almost certainly game over.

Very little to disagree with there, albeit I do think Harpers 1st was a booking, maybe a bit harsh especially when other similar tackles went unpunished.

Agree about the commentators comment re the 2nd booking. Looks clear to me your lad got there first. Even if he did touch it, it's a glance, the ball would have stayed in play and he's taken the lad out. Clear booking.

And that goal kick call for the deflected corner was ridiculous. Did you see where the ref was? No excuse, he was just incompetent.

 

[Soz]

at one point harper got caught late above the knee. nothing. it was staggering what they were getting away with compared to us. the first booking was very harsh, especially considering there's 3-4 equally late fouls by them which go unpunished in the first half. But we had multiple players walking the tightrope at half time and they had none...shite.

obviously red changes the game, we were comfortable with 11 on and defended well for most part with 10 but at full time I did feel relieved to get a point.

 

[The_Viking_Magpie]

Yeah this one confused me. We pressured Vale the entire half, felt like it might be one of those days, freezing our balls off and hoping to get the point we can see we deserve, and then we get a 93rd minute equaliser against local rivals, who happen to be top of the league, away at their ground. Had the shoe been on the other foot, would Vale have just say quietly or would they have gone mad too?

Of all the criticisms, celebrating a last minute equaliser shouldn't be one of them.

Exactly, it's a great moment. Deserved it underserved. Injury time goals to equaliser or better still win and the feeling it gives are one of the reasons we watch games live.

The celebration police are levels above the away followings police. It's just frustration talking.

 

[dannyc5]

Very little to disagree with there, albeit I do think Harpers 1st was a booking, maybe a bit harsh especially when other similar tackles went unpunished.

Agree about the commentators comment re the 2nd booking. Looks clear to me your lad got there first. Even if he did touch it, it's a glance, the ball would have stayed in play and he's taken the lad out. Clear booking.

And that goal kick call for the deflected corner was ridiculous. Did you see where the ref was? No excuse, he was just incompetent.

I just think with the 1st yellow card he could have let him off. It's one of them that usually does result in a yellow (closing down the player clearing the ball and getting there just a bit late). However, I think the contact was minimal, if indeed there was any. Personally, I wouldn't have complained if he was just given a talking to. I think it's a fairly subjective one. A lot of refs would have carded him, but some would have gone for a brief chat.

 

[mozzavale]

I just think with the 1st yellow card he could have let him off. It's one of them that usually does result in a yellow (closing down the player clearing the ball and getting there just a bit late). However, I think the contact was minimal, if indeed there was any. Personally, I wouldn't have complained if he was just given a talking to. I think it's a fairly subjective one. A lot of refs would have carded him, but some would have gone for a brief chat.

I wish he did just give him a telling off.

Maybe you're right, it's the way the game is these days unfortunately.

 

[dannyc5]

at one point harper got caught late above the knee. nothing. it was staggering what they were getting away with compared to us. the first booking was very harsh, especially considering there's 3-4 equally late fouls by them which go unpunished in the first half. But we had multiple players walking the tightrope at half time and they had none...shite.

obviously red changes the game, we were comfortable with 11 on and defended well for most part with 10 but at full time I did feel relieved to get a point.

I didn't notice any challenges we got away with, but I had been in the pub for a good amount of time pre game so I'll trust you on that one!

From the position we were in (11v10 for basically the whole 2nd half), we should have won. We didn't take full advantage of it, so I'm a bit more frustrated than a lot of Crewe fans. However, Vale absolutely deserved a point for the way they defended when down to 10. Defending like that deserves to have some reward. So I think a point each was absolutely right.

 

[mozzavale]

Exactly, it's a great moment. Deserved it underserved. Injury time goals to equaliser or better still win and the feeling it gives are one of the reasons we watch games live.

The celebration police are levels above the away followings police. It's just frustration talking.

But no one is saying anything about the goal celebrations, only you.

 

[The_Viking_Magpie]

But no one is saying anything about the goal celebrations, only you.

Well that's evidently not true.

Maybe stick to whether that shot that resulted in a goal for Port Vale took a deflection or not based on video evidence and freeze frames.

 

[mozzavale]

Well that's evidently not true.

Maybe stick to whether that shot that resulted in a goal for Port Vale took a deflection or not based on video evidence and freeze frames.

Leeds Valiant said he found the end of the game celebrations a bit OTT. But otherwise, no Vale fan is knocking Crewe for celebrating a goal in injury time ‍

No freeze frame or video evidence required, there's a quote function that will suffice...give it a go

 

[The_Viking_Magpie]

He did indeed, told ya. Others (including myself) thought it's very hard to OTT celebrate an injury time equaliser especially in a big game, with big crowd, big away following and especially when a local rivalry. Leeds Valiant isn't alone with his view as we've seen earlier this season.

A quote function is going to help determine whether the ball hit the Crewe player before smashing into the back of the net? I think I will stick to the slow motion replays.