WokingTillIDiet
Active Member
It'll definitely be interesting to see what happens at Aldershot. But already it seems to be following a similar pattern: news of a potential takeover bid by Ashley Read is mysteriously leaked to the press, which obviously is seized upon by supporters, which forces the club to hastily issue a statement. Read once again claims that the club in question approached him rather than the other way round. My gut instinct is that the guy should be given a wide berth. And of course, he never did get to tell us the identities of the other members of the alleged consortium, which he said he would reveal the following week. For what it's worth (probably not much) I was told that we asked him to come up with proof of funds, and he was unable/unwilling to do so.I mean, I'd like to see more up-to-date accounts to see how things might have changed, but yeah, it's irrelevant now and on second thoughts how much of a swing could have happened in a year. The proof will be in what happens at Aldershot. Then we'll know whether we missed out or not. My main gripe is how it seemed to be handled. Sure, Read didn't cover himself in glory, yet I think it was partly down to frustration that talks weren't progressing. Why did it take so long for an NDA to get sorted? We'll never know, I guess, but it irks me that something as serious as a potential takeover had to be leaked to the press in order to get things going. Then there's the resignation of Peter Jordan, and subsequent U-turn. What went on there? Maybe I'm wanting to know too much, but in the last year the distance between the 'club' and fans has grown IMO which makes it all the more difficult to fork out for Boost the Budget etc.
We've always had these ongoing problems, although it really seems to have heightened in the last year. I desperately hope something is being done about it, albeit I'm not quite sure what or how judging by the way a potential takeover was handled. The thought of losing GH and ST because the budget is getting lowered below 300k, which it has been for the past five years, would be such an incredible waste. All good things have to come to an end, of course, I just didn't see it ending in this way - following Chris Ingram sending us on our way and saying we must be self-sufficient - after we've been told that we're running a tight ship off the field (at a loss but with the shares covering it). GH's post-match interview today echoes similar worries.
We'll be laughing in August when GH and ST are still here and the budget stays the same, I hope.
The key to me is what Peter Jordan's intentions are. He apparently said that he wasn't able to fund the club any longer and would be resigning at the beginning of January - but then changed his mind and continued as a club director. But has he just changed his mind about staying at the club, or about providing funds as well? He's a proud man, and I can't see him being willing to stay on at the club if he's not able to contribute financially.
I found Garry Hill's interview after today's game quite encouraging. I'd assumed that he would have got so frustrated this season that he'd almost certainly be off at the end of it, but he spoke once again about how hard everybody works at the club, and that his feelings for the club remain unchanged. It did sound as if he'd be willing to carry on if (obviously that's a big if) we can keep the funding at the same level. I know he's said privately in the past that this would be his last job in management, and he's turned down jobs at clubs with more money than us in the last year or two, so hopefully we can sort out the financial aspect in the next few weeks and go again with the same management team at the helm.