thespus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2015
- Messages
- 1,182
- Reaction score
- 416
- Points
- 83
- Supports
- Arsenal
I think bringing the murder of Jo Cox into this is a bit of a low blow. The bloke had been interested in far-right politics long before Brexit was anywhere near the agenda.
Both sides lied. I'm very open about it having been a horrible campaign. What I can't abide is these holier than thou Remainers claiming their side played clean and stuck to facts. Those absurd leaflets about everyone being worse off by thousands in 2030 and the absolutely deplorable threat about a post-Brexit emergency budget (which surprise surprise never materialised). Have you forgotten all that?
Based more on logic than content—I won't pretend to be as well versed on this topic as you—I don't see how your (bolded) decisions on what to abide avoid hypocrisy. Where there is a divided spectrum, there are extremists with bigoted agendas.
It isn't binary. You voted Leave, and have expressed dissatisfaction with both campaigns, but I wouldn't associate you with racist/xenophobic nutters. Smat voted Remain, and has expressed dissatisfaction with both campaigns, but I wouldn't associate him with those that pass around hyperbolic leaflets.
It's convenient to dismiss the extremists on your side, and then cover the other side of the spectrum in the ad hominem blanket. Anti-feminists do it all the time: "Don't lump me with that rapist ---> "This is why feminism is stupid" ----> *links to the Tumblr blog of some 14 year old girl*
I clearly think the result will be good for the UK and its people. This isn't some weird hypothetical we're talking about. I do live here too...
Is your preceding statement not hypothetical? Is it not the logical equivalent of hypothesizing Brexit will negatively affect the UK?
The only tangible data observed thus far is a devalued currency and the retirement of a few politicians, neither of which are conclusive proofs of any hypothesized result.