St. Juste
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2016
- Messages
- 809
- Reaction score
- 80
- Points
- 28
- Location
- Barra da Tijuca
- Supports
- St. Mirren
I certainly wouldn't gauge the quality of players in a league or the quality of the league based on crowds as there are so many other factors. Otherwise there would be far more Mexicans, Americans and Chinese playing in Europe considering their leagues get better averages than a number of European leagues.
Likewise by your comparison method, the Thai top flight is nearly twice the quality of the Scottish Championship as its average crowd for the last season was 4,741. I suspect it really isn't. I actually reckon it will be a far lower quality. Their top team would be nearly 3 times better than St Mirren as they had an average of 11,934 but in reality I reckon they will be of a lower standard.
To further highlight how absurd it is judge the quality of a league using crowds, in the National League North, Stockport County averaged 3,578 and York City 2,754, whilst in the Southern League Premier Hereford averaged 2,553. Those crowds could all fit in the Football League but the teams are clearly not a good enough standard to be so.
So, to reiterate, how would you compare the two?
Personally, I think it's an incredibly difficult (and somewhat pointless) exercise. Scottish football objectively does well relative to nations of similar size. Due to our proximity a lot of our players and management make the move to the far more lucrative English market.
We don't compete with them, but our increasing attendances (and outstanding proportional attendances) indicate we are happy, and getting happier, with the standard of our domestic game.