Luke Imp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2015
- Messages
- 12,961
- Reaction score
- 3,019
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lincoln
- Supports
- Lincoln City
EDIT - The short version of the below is that there were that many changes over the summer, no-one knew how anything would pan out!I'm surprised at how well you've done to be honest. A lot of the predictions (including your own fans) was for a season of struggle. Usually bring a pretty good following do Lincoln, so I'd imagine maybe 1000?
We're getting a bit more consistent with our performances and have perhaps been unlucky not to get another 6-8 points. What we don't want is to be a hard luck story that plays well but doesn't pick up points.
Looks like we'll need to be fully on it again to get anything again.
I think a big part of that was the unknown due to the big changes behind the scenes at the Club over the summer and also having a lot of players still under contract - ones who didn't perform last season. We've been pretty settled over the last 6 years and I think changes were made behind the scenes because the Board wanted to a) freshen it up after a shambles of a 2021/22, and b) a general step up in the standards, because quite a few were with us back in our NL days. That's not to say they weren't good at their jobs but just like you upgrade players when you move up leagues, it makes sense to do the same behind the scenes as well.
We appointed Kennedy whose managerial experience was 12 games at Macclesfield when they weren't paying anyone, the backroom coaching staff moved to Blackpool with the recently sacked (sorry, mutual consent) Appleton and we 'moved on' nearly all of the sports science and medical department (Mike Hine joined you). The only ones who really remained were the recruitment side, which shows you where the Board thought most of the blame lied for last season.
Over the summer we didn't really sort out all our glaring weakness (probably a big ask to do so) so we're still short of pace at the back, the midfield combinations when we played a three hasn't worked really but in wide areas we did address the lack of pace and a bit of a spark in Diamond and Mandroiu. The difference now is that we're not exposing our weaknesses i.e. compensating for a lack of pace at CB by playing three instead of two, not pressing as high or playing as expansive.
The first third of the season has been one of two halves really. The first 7 games, up to and including our 2-0 defeat at Cambridge, we had 7 points and looked a million miles off it and probably about right in terms of points. We were too expansive, pressed too high, played too high a line for our squad and didn't deal with pressure too well. It was all a bit panicky and no control to it.
The next 7 games have seen us pick up 14 points and in the 6-3 against Bristol Rovers, I think that struck a chord with Kennedy (who wasn't actually very happy after the game) that his preferred way of playing isn't suited to this squad, hence the change albeit I think in October he would have gone a bit more defensive anyway because of who we were coming up against. We haven't had to really chase a game yet either (despite falling behind to Wednesday) so I'd argue we've not been tested in that sense. The whole is greater the sum of its parts at the minute IMO but it's working bloody well. It's a work in progress when we have the ball, we're not particularly fluid but it's been a huge change in results in a short period of time considering it's a new system.
We're not gonna crash the PO's or anything like that, but the recent change in formation gives us a far better chance of settling comfortably in mid-table.