Saddlerrad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 4,077
- Reaction score
- 1,110
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Staffordshire
- Supports
- Walsall
I think Ballance is alright and you can't drop a player with a Test average like that. He clearly has some issues playing the swinging ball though which isn't ideal batting at 3 behind England's openers. I think England need Bell and Root at 3 & 4 with their counter-attacking style and Ballance drops down to 5 where he can get bat on ball a bit more. I do fear Ballance is the next one to need his head getting right and eventually disappearing back to Yorkshire for 6 months. He's a decent limited overs player as he proved batting down the order at Yorkshire and hitting boundaries but he looked mentally fragile out at the World Cup - whether that was just the mentality of the entire team rubbing off or not it's never nice to see a player batting so deep in his crease against moderate pace and wafting reluctantly at anything outside off with that lack of confidence.
That's pretty much what I'm getting at. Keep him, but don't play him at 3. I think he would be entirely better without the weight of the entire innings on him at number 3. If we lose an early wicket he's coming to the crease thinking 'number 3 dictates the entire innings' and perhaps he would be fresher mentally and better for it if he came in at 5, where a steady counter attack would be better, for him and the team.
I'm not asking to drop permanently, or remove him from plans. Just either give him a rest at 3, or pick him to play elsewhere.