El Guapo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2015
- Messages
- 1,363
- Reaction score
- 608
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Birmingham
- Supports
- Birmingham City
There is little to choose between Wolves and Forest in terms of ‘size’. I wouldn’t categorize one above the other. They both have a similar size fan base, similar attendances, success, and both have fluctuated between tier 1 and 2.Getting back to the original question ie Club size, my take on it is this, for what its worth.
I think a clubs size is determined by number of Fans not what trophies it have garnered, some clearly big clubs for example Newcastle and Sunderland mess up season after season, small clubs such as Wimbledon sometimes win the odd thing, dosent change their size.
I also think you have to look over the clubs entire history (crowd wise) most clubs attendances rise and fall depending on circumstances at the time. Note you can find all clubs average attendance at one of the Newcastle sites. I was pleasantly surprised to find my team the mighty Boro stand a respectable 16 best supported English club of all time. Given the crap we get of everybody all the time I feel this puts a bit of correct bias to it.
anyway I have placed all teams in a band 1 to 5 1 being the largest 5 being the smallest, you can argue within each group were each team is placed
Group 1 Leeds, Wolves, Wednesday.
Group 2 Forest, Boro, Derby, Brum.
Group 3 Ipswich, Charlton, QPR, Cardiff, Fulham, Hudds, Hull, Brighton
Group 4 Burnley, Blackburn, PNE, Bristol C, Reading.
Group 5 Brentford, Rotherham, MK Dons.
well there you have it do you think I have I basically right or totally wrong
Granted Wolves were one of the leading clubs in the 1950s and have won more domestically but Forest have since won two European Cups and a League Championship with arguably one of the most iconic managers of all time.